Takedown: Malicious Domain Response Network
B+67
A shared abuse-response platform giving registrars verified threat evidence and an auditable takedown workflow.
TAM
$5.4B
To build
$460K
To MVP
8 mo
LTV:CAC
7.1×
Everyone has a notes app full of ideas. Nobody has the twenty hours per idea it takes to find out whether one of them is worth a year of their life. IdeaNetWorth does that part — market size, unit economics, named competitors, and an honest verdict — for every idea in the library.
No card, free forever, and it takes about twenty seconds. Your notes, ratings and pipeline are yours to keep, on any plan.
A shared abuse-response platform giving registrars verified threat evidence and an auditable takedown workflow.
Paste a DOI and get a layered explanation of the paper, plus an honest read on how much the finding should be trusted.
Hide posts and recommendations containing your chosen topics, semantically, across every major feed at once.
You do not need a thousand ideas. You need the handful you could build alone, this year, that someone would pay for.
You get sent decks with a TAM slide built to flatter. Come to the meeting with your own number.
Most idea reviews are the loudest person in the room winning. Start from one ranked list that nobody in the room wrote.
Every record is researched to the same template, so ideas are genuinely comparable — which is the whole point, and the thing a list in a spreadsheet can never give you.
TAM, SAM, SOM and growth rate, with a note explaining how each number was arrived at.
Startup cost, burn, price point, gross margin, CAC, LTV, payback, break-even month, Year-3 revenue, funding needed.
Market, monetization, feasibility, differentiation, momentum, moat and speed — each judged separately.
Real companies, and specifically where each one leaves a gap. Including when a free platform feature already does it.
The narrowest first market you could win, rather than a fantasy about the whole category.
The reasons it fails, written to be uncomfortable rather than reassuring.
Three concrete things to do next, cheapest first, so research turns into a week of work.
Every estimate is labelled low, medium or high. Filter to the well-grounded ones when it matters.
Start with the curated library, or paste in the ideas you have been collecting for years. Both live in the same place.
Each idea goes through the same research pass — market, competitors, economics, risks — and a curator reviews it before it is published.
Set your thesis weights and your limits on cost, time and capital. What survives is a shortlist you can act on.
Move ideas through your pipeline, rate them, keep notes, compare finalists, and export the shortlist.
Two plans, because there is really only one question: is the exact figure worth $19 to you. A free account browses the whole library — every idea, all seven scores, every chart — and opens five of them in full every day. What $19 buys is precision, depth, and no counting.
See everything the library holds, and find out whether any of it is for you.
For the person who is actually going to build one of these.
| Explorerfree | Serious$19/mo | |
|---|---|---|
| Browse every idea, all seven scores, every chart | Yes | Yes |
| Ideas you can open in full | 5 a day | No limit |
| Market size and unit economics | Ranges | Exact figures |
| Business plan, implementation plan, case study, go-to-market | No | Yes |
| Compare side by side | 2 ideas | 6 ideas |
| CSV and JSON export | No | Yes |
| Credits each month | 50 | 300 |
| Buy more credits | No | Yes |
| Pipeline, ratings, notes and shareable filter links | Yes | Yes |
| Private ideas — your own, visible to nobody else | Yes | Yes |
| Follow, like, comment, share | Yes | Yes |
| Contribute ideas, keep the byline, earn credits | Yes | Yes |
| Ideas you have already opened | Yours permanently, on either plan | |
Everything on the free tier is there for good — it is not a trial and it does not expire. The paid tier is one number: $19 a month, cancel whenever, and a month can also be earned with contribution credits instead of paid for.
Most idea databases are a vendor talking at you. This one pays the people who make it worth reading — because the best ideas come from someone who just watched the problem happen.
A closed loop. Credits come in three ways — your monthly allowance, the welcome grant, and buying them — and leave three ways: putting an idea in front of a curator, asking us to run the research, and redeeming a discount. Everything else is members paying each other. Approval is spent, not printed: a like costs the person giving it exactly the credit you receive, and so do a comment and a share. Nothing here creates credits by approval, which is why it cannot be farmed — two accounts passing credits between themselves end up precisely where they started, and you cannot react to your own idea anyway.
Publishing pays you nothing. That is deliberate. An idea is worth what its readers say it is worth, not what a curator awards for accepting it — so putting one in front of people costs 30 and earns whatever the audience sends it afterwards. An idea nobody reacts to cost its author 30, and that is the right answer.
And credits do not buy their way out of paying. 3,000 of them takes 50% off one month — at 300 a month that is about ten months of saving for one half-price month, applied to your Stripe invoice. Contributing should earn you a discount, not an exit.
Accepted ideas carry your name and link to your profile, with your acceptance rate and the average score of what you have contributed. It is a portfolio of your judgement.
3,000 credits takes 50% off a month, redeemed from your account page in one click and applied by Stripe to your next invoice. No expiry on the credits while you save them up.
Not everything is for publishing. An idea you mark private goes straight into your own library and no further — no curator, no queue, nobody else — and costs 2 credits instead of 10.
50 credits a month free, 300 on Serious, and subscribers can buy more. Nobody can end up unable to take part because they spent what they had on ideas that were not published.
Nothing reaches the library without a curator accepting it, and a rejection comes back with the reason. That is why the queue is capped at ten submissions a day and why volume earns nothing on its own.
They are modelled estimates from a structured research pass, not audited market data — and every record says so, with a confidence flag of low, medium or high. They are internally consistent, which makes them a fair yardstick for ranking ideas against each other. They are not something to put in an investor deck without your own primary research, and we would rather tell you that than pretend otherwise.
Nothing stops you generating one. What is hard is generating five hundred to the same template, so that the numbers are comparable, and then having a human check them. Comparability is the product. A pile of individually plausible summaries is not a library.
No. Your pipeline, ratings, notes and private ideas are yours permanently, and everything you have ever opened stays open — the daily number is an allowance on opening new ideas, not a lease on the old. Downgrading returns you to five new ideas a day. Export is a Serious feature, so that one does stop.
You keep the credit and the byline. You grant IdeaNetWorth a licence to publish the researched version in the library. Ideas are not property — execution is — so nobody here is buying your idea, they are paying you for finding a problem worth looking at.
The research is the product, and it is expensive to produce, so it is not left sitting on the open web to be scraped. Signing up is free and takes about twenty seconds, and it puts the whole library in front of you: every idea, every score, every chart, and five of them opened in full every day.
Because a locked library cannot show you it is worth paying for. A free account browses every idea and every score, and opens five of them in full a day. What you pay for is precision — exact market sizes and unit economics instead of ranges — and the business and implementation plans behind them.
Find out which one it is.